Group test: Philips 42PFL9803H ,Samsung LE-55A956, Sony KDL-55X4500

Yperion

AVClub Fanatic
21 June 2006
43,475
BVR (Beyond Visual Range)
Final verdict

Hype has a nasty habit of spoiling things, making us expect far more of something than it can ever hope to deliver. But on the evidence of this group test, LED is one of those rare instances where the hype is more than justified. All three contenders deliver performances good enough to embarrass almost all standard LCD TVs.

In fact, it's a testament to the all-round quality on show here that the Samsung LE55A956 ends up bagging the third - and bottom - spot in our LED league table. When it's at its best, the LE55A956 is capable of looking little short of magnificent - and, of course, it's extremely cheap for such a large LED TV. But the halo effect that blights some very bright image elements together with viewing angle and some colour tone issues serve to remind us of potential flaws with LED that our other two contenders both do a better job of overcoming.

For a TV as talented as the Philips 42PFL9803H to only come in second seems almost obscenely unfair. Had this TV's stunning picture quality, reams of features and sumptuous design found itself amid a more 'normal' TV group test, it would doubtless have romped home. In fact, its pictures are very often at least a match for our group test winner today. The only problem with it is that its picture quality can slide distractingly thanks to processing side effects if you don't continually pay attention to the TV's long list of settings.

Our winner today, therefore, is the Sony KDL-55X4500. This TV has really caught us by surprise, if we're honest, given that Sony hasn't generally set the world alight in recent times. But there's just no denying that its picture quality is currently not only the best showcase yet for what LED is capable of, but potentially the best picture quality we've seen from any picture technology, period.


http://www.avreview.co.uk/news/article/mps/uan/2700
 

kgkolfis

Established Member
5 February 2009
180
Final verdict

Hype has a nasty habit of spoiling things, making us expect far more of something than it can ever hope to deliver. But on the evidence of this group test, LED is one of those rare instances where the hype is more than justified. All three contenders deliver performances good enough to embarrass almost all standard LCD TVs.

In fact, it's a testament to the all-round quality on show here that the Samsung LE55A956 ends up bagging the third - and bottom - spot in our LED league table. When it's at its best, the LE55A956 is capable of looking little short of magnificent - and, of course, it's extremely cheap for such a large LED TV. But the halo effect that blights some very bright image elements together with viewing angle and some colour tone issues serve to remind us of potential flaws with LED that our other two contenders both do a better job of overcoming.

For a TV as talented as the Philips 42PFL9803H to only come in second seems almost obscenely unfair. Had this TV's stunning picture quality, reams of features and sumptuous design found itself amid a more 'normal' TV group test, it would doubtless have romped home. In fact, its pictures are very often at least a match for our group test winner today. The only problem with it is that its picture quality can slide distractingly thanks to processing side effects if you don't continually pay attention to the TV's long list of settings.

Our winner today, therefore, is the Sony KDL-55X4500. This TV has really caught us by surprise, if we're honest, given that Sony hasn't generally set the world alight in recent times. But there's just no denying that its picture quality is currently not only the best showcase yet for what LED is capable of, but potentially the best picture quality we've seen from any picture technology, period.


http://www.avreview.co.uk/news/article/mps/uan/2700

thanks για τον κόπο σου...
πραγματικά δεν πίστευα ότι η philips είναι καλύτερη από την a956. Μπράβο στη philips!
 

Yperion

AVClub Fanatic
21 June 2006
43,475
BVR (Beyond Visual Range)
Στο FullHd.gr ειχαν πει οτι καλυτερη ειναι η Α656 απο την 9803.

Τελος παντων εκει που μαλλον συμφωνουν οι περισσοτεροι ειναι οτι η καλυτερη LCD ειναι η X4500.
 

clocker

Established Member
12 February 2009
262
Οk led και οι 3 αλλά συγκρίνεται μια 42άρα με μια 55άρα? :alberteinstein:
 

Yperion

AVClub Fanatic
21 June 2006
43,475
BVR (Beyond Visual Range)
Aλλο ενα τεστ...

Panasonic VIERA TH-50PZ800U
Pioneer Elite KURO PRO-111FD
Samsung LN55A950 LCD HDTV
Sony BRAVIA KDL-55XBR8 LCD

While Panasonic’s plasma had the most difficulty with 480p and 1080i material, it was amazingly good with 1080p sources at less than half the price of the other sets here. Blu-ray players that do a good job of upconverting DVDs are under $300 now. For someone willing to feed it a steady diet of 1080p, the Panasonic might be the best value I’m aware of in an HDTV. As for those LCDs, I ranked them second and third overall, but they were really too close to call a winner between the two. The Sony had killer blacks, but I thought the Samsung’s shadow detail was superior. The blacks and all-around performance are simply stunning on these large 55-inch sets. They don’t quite catch up, but when viewed on axis, they rival the mighty Pioneer in every aspect of performance, save one. While I know LCD sets suffer when viewed off axis, I was shocked at how little I had to move off center to see image degradation. The Samsung and Sony were side by side, and one seat was lined up dead center where the two sets met. Sitting in that seat, four picture heights away, it was almost impossible to even compare the two LCDs head to head because the off-axis performance of each was so affected. Still, local dimming has taken LCD to another level in terms of blacks and contrast. These sets were all varying degrees of excellent. One more point was driven home here. The differences in picture quality between the best DVDs and Blu-ray were simply huge on screens this size, and everybody saw it. Even the cheapest set here benefited tremendously, which I think is the opposite of what some people anticipate. Maybe Face Off #2 will be on smaller screens, and we’ll see if this distinction holds up.

http://hometheatermag.com/lcds/face_off_at_the_hdtv_corral/

Συνολικα Pioneer πρωτη , Sony δευτερη , Samsung τριτη , Panasonic τελυταια.