Aπο αυτα που διαβασα καταλαβα οτι δεν θα βγει μοντελο αναμεσα στην ΟΜ5 και στην ΟΜ1 (η οποια αντικατεστησε την ΕΜ1.3 ) και η καθε μια τους ως μοντελο θα εχει το δικο της αποκλειστικό target point, η ΟΜ1 τους ενθουσιωδης και επαγγελματιες φωτογραφους δρασης/BIF και η ΟΜ5 (και η μελλοντική αντικαταστρια της) τους ερασιτεχνες φωτογραφους που θελουν ενα πληρες μικρο στεγανο φωτογραφικο σωμα με ολες τις ηλεκτρονικες λειτουργίες που κυκλοφορουν ανα εποχή
Aποσπασματα σε ερωτηση τι νεα μοντελα θα ερθουν στη χαμηλή κατηγορία
You need to ask “What is entry-level?”, given the current market situation. Many users are using smartphones in everyday situations. So what is the upgrade from that? What is an entry-level camera? It’s different than in the past.
I was discussing the same topic with pointed out that there’d be no point producing a dirt-cheap camera with such limited specs that it only convinced users that their smartphones were better.
Βλεπω απο τις απαντησεις την ΟΜ5 να ειναι πλεον το εισαγωγικο μοντελο ....
Και οι ερωτοαπαντησεις για την μεταφορά της Computational photography ειχαν πολυ ενδιαφέρον :
YN: Computational photography is an important topic for us to focus on. First of all, the important point for cameras, as you know, is that it is a "photography assistant" and for more advanced users, it is a function that leads to "success rate of photography". This point is mainly different from the computational photography of a smartphone.
DE: I think my feelings about AI image enhancement differ from those of most camera manufacturers, in that while I do like having full control over the images at my option, I’d also sometimes like a bit of “help” from the camera. What do you see as OMDS’s strategic direction with computational photography?
YN: There are likely many possibilities. The difficulty is deciding what level we apply to the camera. Many users like a very natural look, and for that don’t want any artificial effects. But smartphone users are used to letting the phone do it all and expect that. The difficulty is deciding what level of AI to apply; that part is very difficult.
DE: I think many times, I’m that second user you spoke of. While I can do whatever I want on the computer, I often don’t want to spend the time it takes to tweak and tune each photo in Photoshop. Sometimes I want to have complete control, but other times I’d like to hand off some of the work to the AI. I’d like to see AI “helper modes” that would do certain things, and then I could dial the amount of the effect up or down, just like other image parameters like contrast, saturation, etc. I feel like having that convenience factor could be important even for enthusiasts.
YN: I think in the future, camera manufacturers will need to do something like that, to add such features.
Υπαρχουν και αλλα ενδιαφεροντα οποιος εχει χρονο ας τη διαβασει ολη , αν ειναι να δουμε νεες ηλεκτρονικες βελτιωσεις στα επερχομενα μοντελα το πιο πιθανο ειναι να συμβει απο τους μικρους κατασκευαστες