Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Κανονισμός Λειτουργίας
Σωματείο AVClub
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Μουσική - Κινηματογράφος - Τηλεόραση - Πολιτισμός
Κινηματογράφος
Παρουσιάσεις Ταινιών - Αφιερώματα
Ευρωπαϊκό Σινεμά και όχι μόνο
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="auteur" data-source="post: 1057382514" data-attributes="member: 16170"><p>ο ευστοχος τιτλος του godard.. <span style="color: #333333"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Histoire(s) du Cinema</span></span></p><p></p><p>Researchers are fond of saying that <strong>there is no film history, only film histories.</strong> For some, this means that there can be no intelligible, coherent βgrand narrativeβ that puts all the facts into place. The history of avant-garde film does not fit neatly into the history of color technology or the development of the Western or the life of John Ford. For others, <strong>film history means that historians work from various perspectives and with different interests and purposes.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p>We agree with both points. There is no Big Story of Film History that accounts for all events, causes, and consequences. And the variety of historical approaches guarantees that historians will draw diverse conclusions.</p><p></p><p>We also think that research into film history involves asking a series of questions and searching for evidence in order to answer them in the course of an argument. When historians focus on different questions, turn up different evidence, and formulate different explanations, we derive not a single history but a diverse set of historical arguments.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.davidbordwell.net/essays/doing.php" target="_blank">http://www.davidbordwell.net/essays/doing.php</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="auteur, post: 1057382514, member: 16170"] ο ευστοχος τιτλος του godard.. [COLOR=#333333][FONT=Verdana]Histoire(s) du Cinema[/FONT][/COLOR] Researchers are fond of saying that [B]there is no film history, only film histories.[/B] For some, this means that there can be no intelligible, coherent βgrand narrativeβ that puts all the facts into place. The history of avant-garde film does not fit neatly into the history of color technology or the development of the Western or the life of John Ford. For others, [B]film history means that historians work from various perspectives and with different interests and purposes. [/B] We agree with both points. There is no Big Story of Film History that accounts for all events, causes, and consequences. And the variety of historical approaches guarantees that historians will draw diverse conclusions. We also think that research into film history involves asking a series of questions and searching for evidence in order to answer them in the course of an argument. When historians focus on different questions, turn up different evidence, and formulate different explanations, we derive not a single history but a diverse set of historical arguments. [URL]http://www.davidbordwell.net/essays/doing.php[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Μουσική - Κινηματογράφος - Τηλεόραση - Πολιτισμός
Κινηματογράφος
Παρουσιάσεις Ταινιών - Αφιερώματα
Ευρωπαϊκό Σινεμά και όχι μόνο
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…