Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Κανονισμός Λειτουργίας
Σωματείο AVClub
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Φωτογραφία - Video
Ανακοινώσεις, συζητήσεις
Τεχνολογικά νέα, καινοτομίες ....από την Νikon.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kosh" data-source="post: 1058830269" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>Mιας και πιασαμε την <a href="https://avclub.gr/index.php?threads/panasonic-s5-ii-kai-s5-iix-i-proti-panasonic-michani-me-pdaf.178946/post-1058830100" target="_blank"><strong>κουβεντα</strong></a> στο νημα <a href="https://avclub.gr/index.php?threads/panasonic-s5-ii-kai-s5-iix-i-proti-panasonic-michani-me-pdaf.178946/post-1058830107" target="_blank"><strong>της S5ii </strong></a>για το θεμα του Raw της Ζ9</p><p></p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.slashcam.de/news/single/Interne-RAW-Aufnahme--Nikon-haelt-RED-Patente-fuer-u-17452.html[/URL]</p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">Nikon is categorically defending itself. At no point does Nikon see itself as violating a valid and enforceable claim based on the patents listed in the statement of claim, since these are simply not enforceable due to "unenforceable conduct" (originally "unenforceable under the doctrine of inequitable conduct").</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">Nikon disputes the validity of the RED patents, arguing that they were applied for too late at the time and should therefore not have been granted. Nikon points out that RED already offered a camera for pre-order at NAB 2006, in which the relevant codec technology was integrated, but it took more than a year before a patent application was filed. The patent, which was only registered after the fixed one-year period had expired, was wrongly granted from Nikon's point of view, since the patent office had no information that the technology had already been implemented and offered for advance sale.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">Nikon also denies that RED has a right to injunctive relief, since - even if a patent infringement should exist - the company has not suffered any damage, let alone irreparable damage.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">We are very curious to see whether and to what extent the court will share Nikon's arguments. So far, to our knowledge, the RED patents have been challenged on a different basis, in which it was intended to prove that there was no infringement or that RED in turn infringed patents.</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)"></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(251, 160, 38)">If this new approach were successful, not only would Nikon be able to maintain its new, professional video claim, but sooner rather than later we would certainly see internal, compressed RAW in other cameras as well.<img src="https://vg06.met.vgwort.de/na/9bf0196ba97a470f9c90664e7b9eb4d9" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(247, 218, 100)"><strong>Αλληλουια !!! Ολοι πισω απο την Νικον στο δικαστηριο <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kosh, post: 1058830269, member: 1288"] Mιας και πιασαμε την [URL='https://avclub.gr/index.php?threads/panasonic-s5-ii-kai-s5-iix-i-proti-panasonic-michani-me-pdaf.178946/post-1058830100'][B]κουβεντα[/B][/URL] στο νημα [URL='https://avclub.gr/index.php?threads/panasonic-s5-ii-kai-s5-iix-i-proti-panasonic-michani-me-pdaf.178946/post-1058830107'][B]της S5ii [/B][/URL]για το θεμα του Raw της Ζ9 [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.slashcam.de/news/single/Interne-RAW-Aufnahme--Nikon-haelt-RED-Patente-fuer-u-17452.html[/URL] [COLOR=rgb(250, 197, 28)][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(251, 160, 38)] Nikon is categorically defending itself. At no point does Nikon see itself as violating a valid and enforceable claim based on the patents listed in the statement of claim, since these are simply not enforceable due to "unenforceable conduct" (originally "unenforceable under the doctrine of inequitable conduct"). Nikon disputes the validity of the RED patents, arguing that they were applied for too late at the time and should therefore not have been granted. Nikon points out that RED already offered a camera for pre-order at NAB 2006, in which the relevant codec technology was integrated, but it took more than a year before a patent application was filed. The patent, which was only registered after the fixed one-year period had expired, was wrongly granted from Nikon's point of view, since the patent office had no information that the technology had already been implemented and offered for advance sale. Nikon also denies that RED has a right to injunctive relief, since - even if a patent infringement should exist - the company has not suffered any damage, let alone irreparable damage. We are very curious to see whether and to what extent the court will share Nikon's arguments. So far, to our knowledge, the RED patents have been challenged on a different basis, in which it was intended to prove that there was no infringement or that RED in turn infringed patents. If this new approach were successful, not only would Nikon be able to maintain its new, professional video claim, but sooner rather than later we would certainly see internal, compressed RAW in other cameras as well.[IMG]https://vg06.met.vgwort.de/na/9bf0196ba97a470f9c90664e7b9eb4d9[/IMG][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(250, 197, 28)][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(247, 218, 100)][B]Αλληλουια !!! Ολοι πισω απο την Νικον στο δικαστηριο :) [/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Φωτογραφία - Video
Ανακοινώσεις, συζητήσεις
Τεχνολογικά νέα, καινοτομίες ....από την Νikon.
Top
Bottom
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…