Τέσσερεις τηλεοράσεις που έχουν πάρει καλές κριτικές στο φόρουμ και έχουν παραπλήσιες τιμές. Ιδέες για να αποκλείσω κάποια απ' αυτές, ώστε να έχω λιγότερες να τεστάρω στα μαγαζιά;
Philips 42PFL7404 vs Samsung 40LE-B650 vs Sony KDL-40W5500 vs LG LH5000
- Thread starter ioannis00
- Start date
Yperion
AVClub Fanatic
Καλες κριτικες στο φορουμ μονο για την B650 και την W5500 εχω διαβασει , για την LΗ5000 και ειδικα για την 7404 δεν εχω διαβασει και τοσα θετικα...
vaggelis1010
New member
Η αποδοση μαυρου που στην καλυτερη περιπτωση ειναι γκρι ...οπου και οσες φορες την εχω δει να παιζει...
Στα δικα μου ματια , δεν εχει καμια σχεση με την Β650 που πηρα τελικα ...
Yperion
AVClub Fanatic
Re: Απάντηση: Philips 42PFL7404 vs Samsung 40LE-B650 vs Sony KDL-40W5500 vs LG LH5000
Video Processing
The 32PFL7404H failed to detect and compensate for the 2-2 PAL film cadence (regardless of whether “PC Mode” was On or Off) with the tough HQV test disc, but real-world usage was more forgiving (although clearly not entirely robust). In fact, the only cadence the TV successfully detected with the HQV test disc was the American 3-2 NTSC one! You know we live in a 60hz-led world when a TV from a Dutch manufacturer works better with the US TV system than the one used in the home territory! To be fair, though, the resulting jaggies from this improper deinterlacing will probably not be too visible given the small size of a 32” TV.
For video content, the TV did a somewhat decent job of smoothing jagged diagonals, but they were still visible for the most part. Finally, scaling was decent, but not exceptional: fine details were a little soft, but there was also no excessive ringing.
http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Philips-32PFL7404H-LCD-HDTV-Review.html
Με λιγα λογια η επεξεργασια εικονας ειναι για τα μπαζα απλως δεν μπορει ο δοκιμαστης να γραψει τοσο ακραια εκφραση και χρησιμοποιει το decent (=ανεκτο)...
Video Processing
The 32PFL7404H failed to detect and compensate for the 2-2 PAL film cadence (regardless of whether “PC Mode” was On or Off) with the tough HQV test disc, but real-world usage was more forgiving (although clearly not entirely robust). In fact, the only cadence the TV successfully detected with the HQV test disc was the American 3-2 NTSC one! You know we live in a 60hz-led world when a TV from a Dutch manufacturer works better with the US TV system than the one used in the home territory! To be fair, though, the resulting jaggies from this improper deinterlacing will probably not be too visible given the small size of a 32” TV.
For video content, the TV did a somewhat decent job of smoothing jagged diagonals, but they were still visible for the most part. Finally, scaling was decent, but not exceptional: fine details were a little soft, but there was also no excessive ringing.
http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Philips-32PFL7404H-LCD-HDTV-Review.html
Με λιγα λογια η επεξεργασια εικονας ειναι για τα μπαζα απλως δεν μπορει ο δοκιμαστης να γραψει τοσο ακραια εκφραση και χρησιμοποιει το decent (=ανεκτο)...