Προφανώς ένας κορυφαίος στον τομέα του επιστήμονας δεν είναι πάντα και καλός στο πως πρέπει να γίνει η διαχείριση της έρευνας...
Το άρθρο λέει ελάχιστα και δίνει λάθος εντυπώσεις.
Να το άρθρο από τους FT στο οποίο κάνει αναφορά το 247
Article text:
The president of the European Research Council β the EU’s top scientist β has resigned after failing to persuade Brussels to set up a large-scale scientific programme to fight Covid-19.
Professor Mauro Ferrari, who started a four-year term as leader of Europe’s flagship scientific institution on January 1, submitted his resignation to EU commission president Ursula von der Leyen on Tuesday afternoon.
βI have been extremely disappointed by the European response to Covid-19,β he said in a statement to the Financial Times. βI arrived at the ERC a fervent supporter of the EU [but] the Covid-19 crisis completely changed my views, though the ideals of international collaboration I continue to support with enthusiasm.β
The ERC, set up in 2007 to fund Europe’s best scientists, has become one of the world’s most prestigious funding agencies with a budget of around 2bn a year.
Prof Ferrari, an Italian-American pioneer of nanomedicine, said his rift with the European Commission started in early March βas it became evident that the pandemic would be a tragedy of possibly unprecedented proportionsβ.
He said he proposed then to set up a special ERC programme to combat Covid-19. βI thought that at a time like this, the very best scientists in the world should be provided with resources and opportunities to fight the pandemic, with new drugs, new vaccines, new diagnostic tools, new behavioural dynamic approaches based on science, to replace the oft-improvised intuitions of political leaders,β he said.
But the ERC Scientific Council, its governing body, unanimously rejected the idea, he said, on the grounds that its remit allows it only to fund βbottom-upβ research proposed by scientists, rather than larger βtop-downβ programmes with objectives set by EU leaders.
βI argued that this was not the time for scientific governance to worry excessively about the subtleties of the distinctions between bottom-up versus top-down research,β said Prof Ferrari, who spent much of his career as a prominent cancer researcher in the US.
He said he got a second chance when Ms von der Leyen asked him for his views on addressing the pandemic. He then developed a plan βto which she contributed substantial directivesβ.
βThe very fact that I worked directly with her created an internal political thunderstorm,β he said. βThe proposal was passed on to different layers of European Commission administration, where I believe it disintegrated upon impact.β
The commission confirmed that Prof Ferrari had stepped down but did not respond to a request for further comment.
Prof Ferrari lamented βthe complete absence of co-ordination of healthcare policies among member states, the recurrent opposition to cohesive financial support initiatives, the pervasive one-sided border closuresβ in the EU.
The pandemic has stoked tensions within the bloc and led to criticism that some EU countries have failed to co-operate or show solidarity with those hit hardest by coronavirus.
Janez Lenarcic, the EU’s crisis management commissioner, said on Tuesday that member states had initially not offered the help needed by Italy as the death toll there soared.
βThere was an inadequate response to the Italian request for assistance from other EU member states,β he told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday, as he unveiled a plan to dispatch doctors and nurses from Romania and Norway to Italy. βBut things have changed now.β
With the commission’s agreement, Prof Ferrari remained a part-time affiliate professor at the University of Washington School of Pharmacy in Seattle after he became ERC president. He plans now to set up an international research initiative to fight Covid-19 from the US.
https://www.ft.com/content/f94725c8-e038-4841-a5f6-2e046ae78e95?shareType=nongift
:eviltongue:
