-LG TV Line-up 2020-

xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
We compare the picture quality of the LG GX vs the Sony A8 (also marketed as the Bravia A8H in the USA), both 2020 OLED TVs. Our findings can also be applied to the LG CX which has the same panel and video processing as the GX.

Topics covered include near-black handling, colour accuracy, motion performance including 120Hz BFI, video processing including upscaling, screen uniformity, HDR including Dolby Vision, as well as gaming including input lag.

Our review samples are the 65-inch LG OLED65GX and Sony KD-65A8.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANgAuVHAuEg
source:[hdtvtest.co.uk]
 
H

hristoslav2

Senior Member
8 January 2016
387
Varna, Bulgaria
TV MODELS
LG 2020		HDMI ports versionHFR
(3840x2160 / 120HZ)		VRR
(40-120Hz)		FreeSyncG-SyncALLMeARCARC
LG OLED RX4x 2.1 (40 Gbit / s)available (+ 8K / 60Hz)missingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG OLED ZX (8K)2x 2.1 (48 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)available (+ 8K / 60Hz)availableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailable
LG OLED WX4x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availablemissingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG OLED GX4x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailable
LG OLED CX4x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailable
LG OLED BX2x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO99 (8K)2x 2.1 (48 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availablemissingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO97 (8K)2x 2.1 (48 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availablemissingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO95 (8K)2x 2.1 (48 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availablemissingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO912x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailablemissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO902x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailablemissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO862x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s) / 2x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailablemissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO854 x 2.1 (40 Gbit/s)availableavailableavailablemissingavailableavailableavailable
LG NANO814x 2.0b (18 gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG NANO804x 2.0b (18 gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG NANO794x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG UN854x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailableavailableavailable
LG UN813x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG UN803x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG UN743x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG UN733x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
LG UN713x 2.0b (18 Gbit/s)missingmissingmissingmissingavailablemissingavailable
 
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
We compare the picture quality of OLED vs QLED TV in a side-by-side comparison, using two 2020 4K models, namely the LG CX OLED vs the Samsung QE Q95T/ Q90T QLED television.

Aspects compared include contrast performance, colour accuracy, motion handling, video processing, screen uniformity, HDR, input lag for gaming, HDMI 2.1 support, viewing angles, as well as bright-room usage.

Our review samples are the 55-inch LG OLED55CX and Samsung QE55Q95T.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrnG6Dcxpls
source:[hdtvtest.co.uk]
 
H

hristoslav2

Senior Member
8 January 2016
387
Varna, Bulgaria
--ZXRX, WXGX, CXBXNANO99, NANO97, NANO95NANO91, NANO90, NANO86NANO81, NANO80UN85UN81, UN80, UN74, UN73, UN71
HDMI 2.1 (48 Gbps)2x 48 Gbpsnonono2x 48 Gbpsnononono
HDMI 2.1 (40 Gbps)2x 40 Gbps4x 40 GBps4x 40 Gbps2x 40 Gbps2x 40 Gbps2x 40 Gbpsno2x 40 Gbpsno
HDMI 2.0b (18 Gbps)nonono2x 18 Gbpsno2x 18 GbpsYes2x 18 GbpsYes
FRL (Fixed Rate Link)YesYesYesYesYesYesnoYesno
eARC (Enhanced ARC)YesYesYesYesYesYesnoYesno
ALLM (Auto Low Latency Mode)YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
VRR (HDMI VRR)40-120Hzno40-120Hz40-120Hzno48-120Hz *nonono
VRR (AMD FreeSync)40-120Hzno40-120Hz40-120Hzno48-120Hz *nonono
VRR (NVIDIA GSync)40-120Hzno40-120Hz40-120Hznonononono
4K HFR 120fps (@ 10bit 4: 4: 4)YesYesYesYesYesYesnoYesno
2K HFRYesYesYesYesYesYesnoYesno
* With separate mode for 90-120Hz

Hdmi%202.1%20resolutions.jpg
 
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
We review the LG 65GX (pronounced as G10) OLED TV which has been designed to be wall-mounted flush against the wall. Topics covered include near-black handling, colour accuracy, motion performance including [OLED Motion Pro] 120Hz black frame insertion, video processing, screen uniformity, HDR including Dolby Vision, as well as input lag + AMD Freesync Premium support (added by firmware 3.10.xx) for gaming. We also demonstrate the ThinQ AI hands-free voice assistant.

Our LG GX review sample is the 65-inch LG OLED65GX, but it also comes in 55-inch (OLED55GX) and 77-inch (OLED77GX) screen sizes.

This video was graded and uploaded in HDR10, and so is best viewed on an HDR display. Please let us know how it looks to you in the Youtube comment section below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr761Qu3bzE
source:[hdtvtest.co.uk]
 
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
48"...[tweakers.net]...LG 48CX6LB review...https://tweakers.net/reviews/8030/lg-cx-48-inch-oled-tv-review-eindelijk-een-kleiner-maatje.html

μετάφραση google nl to en


WOLED+Color filter,RGBW panel by LG Display

Made in Republic of Korea

2003767786.png


2003757310.jpeg


2003757322.jpeg


2003757328.jpeg


2003757326.jpeg


2003727510.jpeg




Conclusion

We are very pleased with the CX because this TV scores well on almost all points. We were last year with the C9, but we found the awkwardly short power cord a downside. Unfortunately, the CX is also equipped with such a stingy short and detachable cable of which you only have a meter left when you use the cable guide in the base. We do not understand that with such an expensive TV you have to save on the power cord.

The image quality is simply great: the contrast is enormous, the viewing angles are very wide and the display is very accurate. The large contrast makes viewing HDR images an experience, but the maximum brightness is clearly less in a lot of ambient light, especially compared to expensive LCDs. Still, these days it is possible to see well with a little more light in the viewing area, because the average brightness can be increased at the expense of some accuracy.

The CX is an excellent choice for gamers. The input lag is low, there is support for variable frame rates in the form of freesync and G-Sync and, moreover, 4k images with 120fps can be displayed thanks to HDMI 2.1. Thanks to webOS and the Magic Remote, the operation is also pleasant and the sound is also excellent. It is a pity that the support for dts sound has been discontinued this year.

Due to scarcity, the 48" model we tested is still very expensive for the time being. More expensive even than the 55" version. It is nice that there is now a smaller size, but at the moment the price is really too high. In addition, the differences with last year's C9 are very small and it still supports dts sound. As long as the C9 is still available, that is in our eyes the better choice.
 
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
65"...[avforums.com]...LG 65NANO906NA review...https://www.avforums.com/reviews/lg-nano90-lcd-tv-review.17845


65Nano90:IPS panel and Full Array Local Dimming (FALD) backlight with 32 separate zones.
LED LCD
WCG (aka NanoCell)
100/120Hz με MCFI
α7 Gen3
WebOS

image.php


Where the Nano90 really performs well is in a typical living room with ambient lighting present


Verdict:

Overall, the LG Nano90 is a competent LED LCD TV that has the usual issues associated with the technology and performs adequately with all the various content thrown at it. It performs well in a normal living room with an accurate image quality that displays content as it should be seen and will handle hours of gaming and the latest consoles, thanks to it’s two HDMI 2.1 ready inputs. The Nano90 is not suited to use in a dimly lit room for critical movie watching as the drawback of this type of panel and the lack of dimming zones just highlights the weaknesses. It is far more successful as a living room workhorse with the lights kept on.

Build quality is reasonable for the price point and the smart TV system is still one of the very best available on the market. Sadly, there is no Freeview Play and there are no signs of the terrestrial catch-up apps appearing from the likes of the BBC iPlayer in the near future, but it does have Disney + and Apple TV+ apps available.

Sound quality is decent for a large TV with downward-firing speakers producing clear dialogue and a nice expansive soundstage. It will, of course, be outperformed by a standalone soundbar for movie watching, but for day to day run of the mill TV viewing it is perfectly adequate.

And that word seems to sum the Nano90 up for me. It is not a world-beater and it doesn’t suddenly reshape the LCD TV landscape with its performance attributes. It’s not a dedicated movie TV for bringing Hollywood to your home in the dark, but within the right environment, the image quality looks accurate and detailed, with decent motion. It has good Smart TV, good input lag for gaming and is a strong performer with the lights on.
 
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
55"...[prohardver.hu]...LG 55UN81003LB test...https://prohardver.hu/teszt/lg_un8100_4k_teve/lg_un8100.html

μετάφραση google hu to en

55UN8100:IPS panel
Direct-LED LCD
50/60Hz
HDR support:HDR10,HLG
webOS 5.0

img_hatcsat.jpg


img_izo3.thumb.jpg


tavir.jpg


Profiles/settings...................Eco........................Vivid..................Original...............filmmaker................HDR effect
Brightness (white point).....299.3cd/m²...........384.1cd/m²..........298.7cd/m²..........97.3cd/m²..............282.3cd/m²
Brightness (black dot)........0.2899cd/m².........0.3137cd/m²........0.3139cd/m².........0.1373cd/m²...........0.3132cd/m²
contrast ratio....................1001.4:1...............1224.6:1...............951.5:1................708.4:1...................901.2:1
Largest delta E....................15.35...................16.35...................14.71.....................13.2.......................13.53
Average delta E....................6.34....................7.66.....................6.56......................5.98........................6.29
color Temperature................11100K..............10300K.................11100K..................6500K......................6500 K

Profiles/settings............ISF expert dark room......ISF expert bright room............Game..................Sports.....................Theater
Brightness (white point)........194.6cd/m²..............240.7cd/m²......................273.8cd/m²...........332.9 cd/m².............241.3cd/m²
Brightness (black dot)............0.2715cd/m²...........0.3192cd/m².....................0.3108cd/m².........0.3134cd/m²............0.3231cd/m²
contrast ratio.........................746.9:1.....................754:1...........................880.9:1.................1062.3:1..................746.9: 1
Largest delta E........................13.06......................13.03............................13.19....................15.58........................12.99
Average delta E.........................6..........................6.07..............................6.17.......................8.51.........................6.08
color Temperature...................6600K.....................6600K............................9500K...................14300K......................6500 K




Then we tried to shoot the target values:6500 K color temperature, 2.2 gamma
At a maximum brightness of 119.7 cd / m², the black level is 0.2701, which means that the real contrast is only 443.3: 1.

Settings SDR:

Contrast:79 (επίπεδο λευκού)
Backlight: 69 (ένταση οπίσθιου φωτισμού LED)
Brightness: 47(επίπεδο μαύρου)
Sharpness: 10
color Depth: 50
shade:0
Dynamic contrast: off
super Resolution: off
color Range: Extended
Gamma: 2.2
black Level: Low image control
eye Care: off
TruMotion: off
Noise abatement: off
MPEG noise reduction: off
Smooth gradation : off
color Temperature:Warm2
 
Last edited:
xavito

xavito

Moderator
Staff member
29 October 2008
9,324
We review firmware update 03.10.20 on the LG CX/ GX OLED TV, using two OLED48CX to show the difference from the earlier firmware of 03.00.70 to 03.10.20.

Another upgrade we forgot to mention with firmware 03.10.20 was that the internal pattern generator can now be used to validate HDR10 & HLG calibration.

Since we filmed this video, another firmware version 03.10.44 has gone live, which brings no change in picture performance, only some audio and maybe other improvements.

The LG 48CX on your left looked slightly out of focus, because we were using wide open lens aperture for a cleaner footage with lower ISO.

Warning: Disabling [GSR] in the service menu may increase the risk of permanent OLED screenburn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khAuKTM7hl8
source:[hdtvtest.co.uk]
 
Top Bottom