vas_papavas
Supreme Member
- 21 December 2010
- 8,847
λογικά μετά την αγορά μπλέκεις με το κατάστημα αγοράς και οχι με την αντιπροσωπείας. στην επιδόσεις της τιβι δεν έχει επίδραση. το πρόβλημα ίσως προκύψει αν χρειαστεί αντικατάσταση ή επισκευή.
Δηλαδη και multirama που την εχει κατοπιν παραγγελιες παραεισαγωγη ειναι?ενταξει τα αγνωστα τα μαγαζια που εχει στο skrutz εκει το καταλαβαινω αλλα multirama?
φαβορι στην οποια αγορα μου θα ειναι το Πλαισιο...
η ιστορια με τις U20 απεδειξε οτι μπορω να βασιζομαι σ'αυτους,σε αντιθεση με τα αλλα παιδια που ακομα περιμενουν....
ειχαν αγορασει απο μουλτιραμα και Κωτσοβολο αν δε κανω λαθος....
The Panasonic TX-P50GT50B is the third in a series of very similar and very excellent Plasma TVs we’ve reviewed from the Japanese manufacturer’s 2012 range. Like nearly every Plasma television the company has released, it represents outstanding picture quality and value for money. If you’re familiar with their 2012 Plasma lineup, think of the GT50 as a VT50 with a slightly plainer design and a less cutting-edge anti-reflective filter. Those are basically the only significant differences we could see, and whether you end up with an ST50, GT50 or VT50, it’s win-win, because they’re all brilliant.
The TX-P50GT50 excels in nearly every usage scenario that we can think of. The only situation in which we’d advise against its purchase would be for an exceptionally bright room, where an LED LCD TV stands a better chance at being able to produce a picture that’s bright enough to compete with ambient light. However, for the average viewing environment, a Plasma such as the Panasonic GT50 will provide superior picture quality to the LED LCD competition.
For this reason, we’d say that most of the TX-P50GT50B’s competition comes from elsewhere in the Panasonic Plasma range (although Samsung has produced some very good Plasmas recently, too – and we look forward to seeing their 2012 models). Is the GT50 worth the extra over the already excellent ST50? You decide: the GT50 and VT50 are both slightly dimmer than the ST50, although probably due to their THX Certification, they produce better picture quality out of the box, whereas the ST50′s slight green tinge needs to be adjusted out by an experienced calibrator for the best quality. The GT50 does also feature slightly better overall picture quality than the ST50, with more shades of gradation, although the difference is pretty subtle in our opinion. And, the ST50′s picture quality could be judged better by many due to the fact that it can go brighter in its most configurable picture modes.
During the time the TX-P50GT50 has been with us, we incidentally calibrated some other LED LCD televisions and ran them side by side with the GT50. After a Panasonic Plasma binge, we’re glad that we did, because it’s a sobering reminder of the competition. Many LED LCDs certainly provide good picture quality, and we have no bias towards one display technology or the other – if an LED LCD was to come along that had the same uniformity, freedom from viewing angle restrictions, and black depth, we’d be all over it – but no such (consumer?) LED LCD display exists.
Its suitability for a wide range of applications, excellent image quality, and value for money mean that the Panasonic TX-P50GT50B gets the same rating as its ST50 and VT50 siblings:
θα παρω και εγω αυριο πανασονικ να ρωτησω γιατι βιαζομαι για αγορα της vt50. Καλα αν ισχυει ειναι απαραδεκτοι!Στην Ευρωπη κυκλοφορει και εμεις εδω να περιμενουμε μεχρι Ιουλιο?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.